COGGINSS

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 201 through 225 (of 278 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • COGGINSS
    Participant

      I can’t imagine that this construction and installation won’t have a detrimental effect on both the Van Cortlandt House Museum and the Enslaved Persons Burial Ground and the Nature Center, in terms of visitors. Also might this construction have any effect on the physical integrity of the museum structure? I’m not an engineer but there will have to be some pretty serious concrete pylons installed to support a stadium of this magnitude.

      This park is also adjacent to wooded area, the wetlands and the Putnam trail which I imagine visitors will not be as motivated to visit with the noise, vibration and general construction site disruption. On so many levels this is a train wreck for the ecological and socio-cultural-historical health of the Park.

       

      in reply to: Recent TV Show about Spuyten Duyvil #3416
      COGGINSS
      Participant

        Jillian, there were a couple of inaccuracies in the presentation.

         

        1) Yes, the property was bought “as of right”, but the permits oy allowed for interior demolition. The paperwork filed by the developers also evidenced the presence of asbestos. So when the roof started coming off, and the community and CB8 alerted the DOB, DOB  sat on their hands for 11 weeks until the damage was done.

        2) When I reviewed the paperwork for the latest request for landmarking, nothing stated that VRB was in bad shape, too bad for landmarking. The damage preventing landmarking appears to be done during the this rogue roof demolition period. I don’t know who CUNY spoke to at Landmarks, someone who wouldn’t identify themselves by name, but I never heard that VRB was so bad off it couldn’t be landmarked, at least not until it was destroyed by the contractor.

        I had always heard that the family owning VRB had been approached to landmark but rejected the idea because it would constrain them.

        Another thing that is dead wrong is the claim that neighbors complaints shut down the construction. It’s partly true that sustained community complaints forced DOB to pull their paperwork and that’s what shut it down. Three full SWOs public and worker hazards and roof demolition in the presence of asbestos. The show states that there was an asbestos survey during the SWOs.  Tests had to be done to determine the release and presence of asbestos outside  the house as the result of the demolition.  But the presence of asbestos was known by DOB on Day 1.

        So there was no “loophole” per se. Just a whole lot of enabling on the part of a public agency who’s mission in part is to police construction and protect people from violations. Not so much.

         

         

         

         

        in reply to: Recent TV Show about Spuyten Duyvil #3380
        COGGINSS
        Participant

          Although there are a few factual errors in the section on Villa Rosa Bonheur, it’s otherwise a great episode. It’s respectful of the community, appreciating the commitment of local people and Groups to the specialness of the place we call home.

          That’s my favorite part.

          COGGINSS
          Participant

            The date has been changed to March 31.

            in reply to: The Guggenheim in Henry Hudson Park #3289
            COGGINSS
            Participant

              Yes Nick, it certainly wouldn’t be a middle class community, for sure.

              in reply to: The Guggenheim in Henry Hudson Park #3274
              COGGINSS
              Participant

                And this is another reason Spuyten Duyvil is Spuyten Duyvil, and Riverdale is Riverdale. Henry Hudson Park is in the former, and conflating the two is confusing and wrong.

                in reply to: The Guggenheim in Henry Hudson Park #3273
                COGGINSS
                Participant

                  in reply to: Oyster Inquiry #3226
                  COGGINSS
                  Participant

                    <p style=”text-align: right;”>Wading Place</p>

                    in reply to: Old Resident Tells of Former Days (Part 1) #3223
                    COGGINSS
                    Participant

                      Is there a Part 2 and 3? I only see 1 and 4.

                       

                      Thank you.

                      in reply to: Church of the Mediator Holiday Concert #3082
                      COGGINSS
                      Participant

                        in reply to: CHURCH OF THE MEDIATOR – Open House #2945
                        COGGINSS
                        Participant

                          Church of the Mediator - Open House

                          in reply to: Locally Grown Apples #2941
                          COGGINSS
                          Participant

                            Apples growing on Edgehill Church in Spuyten Duyvil

                            in reply to: Locally Grown Apples #2940
                            COGGINSS
                            Participant

                              Apples growing on Edgehill Church in Spuyten Duyvil

                              in reply to: Locally Grown Apples #2939
                              COGGINSS
                              Participant

                                Apples growing on Edgehill Church in Spuyten Duyvil

                                in reply to: Veteran’s Monument – American Legion Project #2876
                                COGGINSS
                                Participant

                                  Nick, there is a new Riverdale Facebook Group specifically for Riverdale Veterans.

                                  https://www.facebook.com/groups/riverdalenyc/permalink/1165090274060381/

                                  in reply to: Origins of Knolls Crescent/ Development & the Nane #2844
                                  COGGINSS
                                  Participant

                                    I’ve got the fever: gotta figure this out.

                                    That said, I live next door to the “Fieldston Lod_e” (sic), rehab center which has nothing to do with Fieldston and is not a Lodge.  So these developers pick these names, sometimes just because they sound fancy.

                                    in reply to: Origins of Knolls Crescent/ Development & the Nane #2842
                                    COGGINSS
                                    Participant

                                      in reply to: Origins of Knolls Crescent/ Development & the Nane #2841
                                      COGGINSS
                                      Participant

                                        Garrett, you appear to possibly beright. (although Knolls Crescent is in Spuyten Duyvil)

                                        I wonder if Alexander Calder having lived in Spuyten Duyvil had anything to do with the possible choice of that site?

                                         

                                        in reply to: Origins of Knolls Crescent/ Development & the Nane #2840
                                        COGGINSS
                                        Participant

                                          in reply to: Origins of Knolls Crescent/ Development & the Nane #2837
                                          COGGINSS
                                          Participant

                                            Thanks so much Tom.

                                            in reply to: Ploughman’s Bush #2831
                                            COGGINSS
                                            Participant

                                              I disagree that this sounds like just a nice old house. From LPC’s 2004 report:

                                              This structure is the former the Delafield Hunting Lodge of the once vast Delafield Estate, which originally encompassed land between the Hudson River and Van Cortlandt Park. It was used as a lodge during hunting excursions in the woodlands, allegedly for hunting wild boar. The Delafield Estate was subdivided in 1934, and the structure now sits within a private residential area known as Ploughman’s Bush.

                                              LPC Statement of Significance:

                                              The Fieldston (Delafield Estate) Building appears to be a rare example in New York City of a 19th-century rural bracketed, board-and-batten estate outbuilding. In 1829, Major Joseph Delafield, president of the Lyceum of Natural History in New York, acquired the 257-acre Hadley farm in (then) Yonkers that spread eastward from the shore of the Hudson River. Delafield named his estate “Fieldston” after his family’s seat in Ireland, and established a profitable lime kiln on the property in 1830. A cottage, named “Fieldston Lodge,” was built in 1849 and as a three-bay, 1-1/2 story Gothic Revival style summer home in the mode of Alexander Jackson Davis and Andrew Jackson Downing. This area, known as Riverdale after 1852, became popular for the estates of wealthy New York families, who acquired large tracts of land here beginning in the late 1820s. These included lawyer William Lewis Morris’ residence (later called Wave Hill), built in 1843-44, and actor Edwin Forrest’s Fonthill, built in 1848-52. The Hudson River Railroad, completed in this vicinity in 1849, provided convenient access to New York City.

                                              For some time prior to Major Delafield’s death in 1875, Fieldston Lodge was in use as the summer cottage of his eldest son, Lewis Livingston Delafield. The father’s will, written in 1867, mentions the the property then contained two cottages, one in use by the father and one in use by the son, as well as outbuildings such as a “stable and coachhouse and laundry.” Lewis Delafield expanded Fieldston Lodge in 1877-78 to five bays and two full stories plus a slate-covered mansard roof, with a wide front verandah. Local builder Samuel L. Berrian executed this addition. The building that is today No. 6 Ploughman’s Bush is similar in style and details to the expanded Fieldston Lodge (which remained until at least the 1950s.) A review of real estate maps, however, demonstrates that the Ploughman’s Bush building may appear as early as 1867.

                                              The eastern portion of the Joseph Delafield Estate was developed by the Delafield family as the community of Fieldston in 1909-23, and the western part of the estate was later subdivided. This outbuilding is the only surviving building remnant of the original Delafield Estate, an estate associated with one of New York City’s, and the Bronx’s leading families. It is also a significant reminder of the era when the Riverdale section of the Bronx was largely a private community of rural, and later, suburban summer estates.

                                              in reply to: Ploughman’s Bush #2829
                                              COGGINSS
                                              Participant

                                                photo taken this morning

                                                in reply to: Ploughman’s Bush #2828
                                                COGGINSS
                                                Participant

                                                  in reply to: Ploughman’s Bush #2827
                                                  COGGINSS
                                                  Participant

                                                    Yes I think I need to speak to Chuck Moerdler or Sherida Paulson.

                                                    Maybe Dan Padernacht remembers something about it.

                                                    It does look like the current occupants have toyed around with it quite a bit. It’s a bit wacky.

                                                    And DOB currently has a full Stop Work Order on it.

                                                     

                                                     

                                                    in reply to: Map of early Spuyten Duyvil development #2822
                                                    COGGINSS
                                                    Participant

                                                      I have a down loaded version of that map, and the current president of the Along the Hudson Homeowners Association is my best friend here in Spuyten Duyvil. I paid the $50 dollars because I needed the map for my street co-naming project for John J McKelvey Sr/ Villa Rosa Bonheur. But before I downloaded it, I just made a copy from what was available online. It might not have been HR but it did the job just to look at. I also have a copy of the Edgehill Terrace Company map, which I “bought” from MCNY.

                                                      I’m not sure what your using this for, but feel free to contact me at stephaniecoggins1900@gmail.com.

                                                    Viewing 25 posts - 201 through 225 (of 278 total)